<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still no sign of Solar Cycle 24</title>
	<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/</link>
	<description>A blog of solar physics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: acer</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-2613</link>
		<dc:creator>acer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-2613</guid>
		<description>I suppose that the main question is what effect this will have on the Earth’s climate and in particular its cloudiness from Svensmark’s hypothesis. We enter some interesting times…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose that the main question is what effect this will have on the Earth’s climate and in particular its cloudiness from Svensmark’s hypothesis. We enter some interesting times…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Link to "Spotless Days" page, 

http://users.telenet.be/j.janssens/Spotless/Spotless.html 

with records of periods of spotless days =&#62; 20 days since 1849</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link to &#8220;Spotless Days&#8221; page, </p>
<p><a href="http://users.telenet.be/j.janssens/Spotless/Spotless.html" rel="nofollow">http://users.telenet.be/j.janssens/Spotless/Spotless.html</a> </p>
<p>with records of periods of spotless days =&gt; 20 days since 1849</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>John A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Still nothing on the disk. According to solarcycle24.com, that makes 15 straight days so far.

I was rather skeptical about Archibald's claims as to the late arrival of Solar Cycle 24, but the longer this goes on, the more likely that the next cycle will be weak rather than strong.

I suppose that the main question is what effect this will have on the Earth's climate and in particular its cloudiness from Svensmark's hypothesis. We enter some interesting times...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still nothing on the disk. According to solarcycle24.com, that makes 15 straight days so far.</p>
<p>I was rather skeptical about Archibald&#8217;s claims as to the late arrival of Solar Cycle 24, but the longer this goes on, the more likely that the next cycle will be weak rather than strong.</p>
<p>I suppose that the main question is what effect this will have on the Earth&#8217;s climate and in particular its cloudiness from Svensmark&#8217;s hypothesis. We enter some interesting times&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. S.</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>J. S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you're still writing in this blog.

It's astounding that we have still not seen a single Cycle 24 spot at this late date. Admittedly, that fact could change tomorrow, but it's an interesting surprise. Surprises are learning opportunities!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you&#8217;re still writing in this blog.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s astounding that we have still not seen a single Cycle 24 spot at this late date. Admittedly, that fact could change tomorrow, but it&#8217;s an interesting surprise. Surprises are learning opportunities!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>John A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I started this a few months ago. I just wanted to get a handle on the current state of solar science. 

At the moment, the late arrival of Solar Cycle 24 and the predictions of its strength seem most noteworthy.

Any help with pertinent solar physics articles gratefully received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started this a few months ago. I just wanted to get a handle on the current state of solar science. </p>
<p>At the moment, the late arrival of Solar Cycle 24 and the predictions of its strength seem most noteworthy.</p>
<p>Any help with pertinent solar physics articles gratefully received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Pompe</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Pompe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Give it time I suspect it's a little early yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give it time I suspect it&#8217;s a little early yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaemery@charter.net</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>jaemery@charter.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/09/still-no-sign-of-solar-cycle-24/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Cool.  When did you start this site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool.  When did you start this site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
