Comments on: Predictions of Solar Cycle 24: Clilverd et al http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/10/predictions-of-solar-cycle-24-cliverd-et-al/ A blog of solar physics Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:54:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Curious http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/10/predictions-of-solar-cycle-24-cliverd-et-al/#comment-3617 Curious Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:49:07 +0000 http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/10/predictions-of-solar-cycle-24-cliverd-et-al/#comment-3617 Dalton Minimum by 2100 (if I didn't get it wrong...). Just three weak cycles untill 2030. Regards. Dalton Minimum by 2100 (if I didn’t get it wrong…).
Just three weak cycles untill 2030.

Regards.

]]> By: Harold Vance http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/10/predictions-of-solar-cycle-24-cliverd-et-al/#comment-43 Harold Vance Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:17:15 +0000 http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/10/predictions-of-solar-cycle-24-cliverd-et-al/#comment-43 I found a very interesting summary of Solar Cycle 24 predictions at Jan Janssen's web site. Interesting commentary, too: http://users.telenet.be/j.janssens/SC24.html I found the link on the SolarAstronomy message board on yahoo: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SolarAstronomy/ btw, thanks for setting up a blog on this topic. I found a very interesting summary of Solar Cycle 24 predictions at Jan Janssen’s web site. Interesting commentary, too:

http://users.telenet.be/j.janssens/SC24.html

I found the link on the SolarAstronomy message board on yahoo:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SolarAstronomy/

btw, thanks for setting up a blog on this topic.

]]> By: John A http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/10/predictions-of-solar-cycle-24-cliverd-et-al/#comment-41 John A Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:03:30 +0000 http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/10/predictions-of-solar-cycle-24-cliverd-et-al/#comment-41 Windansea: Thanks for the link. I think its generally healthy to have different theories diverge as to what happens next, which means that some are going to be disproven by facts that cannot be disputed. It is somewhat of a surprise to see how generally unrigorous the literature on solar science is. It has the feel of a very young science finding its feet in a world of competing conjectures. Windansea: Thanks for the link. I think its generally healthy to have different theories diverge as to what happens next, which means that some are going to be disproven by facts that cannot be disputed.

It is somewhat of a surprise to see how generally unrigorous the literature on solar science is. It has the feel of a very young science finding its feet in a world of competing conjectures.

]]> By: windansea http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/10/predictions-of-solar-cycle-24-cliverd-et-al/#comment-40 windansea Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:44:46 +0000 http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2007/09/10/predictions-of-solar-cycle-24-cliverd-et-al/#comment-40 the range of predictions for 24 are great, here is an unbiased article discussing the prediction http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/articles?article=59 the range of predictions for 24 are great, here is an unbiased article discussing the prediction

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/articles?article=59

]]>