<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Apocalyptic Temptation: A plea for scientific rationality &#8211; part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2008/06/15/the-apocalyptic-temptation-a-plea-for-scientific-rationality-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2008/06/15/the-apocalyptic-temptation-a-plea-for-scientific-rationality-part-1/</link>
	<description>A blog of solar physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:44:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Goodknight</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2008/06/15/the-apocalyptic-temptation-a-plea-for-scientific-rationality-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Goodknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2008/06/15/the-apocalyptic-temptation-a-plea-for-scientific-rationality-part-1/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>It has been months since Part 1, where is Part II? :)

Thanks for the blog, I check it regularly. You don&#039;t say much but it is always well-reasoned. I BS&#039;d in Physics in the &#039;70&#039;s, had SKY &amp; CLOUD been on the horizon then I expect I&#039;d not have gone over to the dark side, Engineering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been months since Part 1, where is Part II? <img src='http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for the blog, I check it regularly. You don&#8217;t say much but it is always well-reasoned. I BS&#8217;d in Physics in the &#8217;70&#8217;s, had SKY &amp; CLOUD been on the horizon then I expect I&#8217;d not have gone over to the dark side, Engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alana</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2008/06/15/the-apocalyptic-temptation-a-plea-for-scientific-rationality-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Alana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2008/06/15/the-apocalyptic-temptation-a-plea-for-scientific-rationality-part-1/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>New update from David Hathaway at NASA:

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/11jul_solarcycleupdate.htm

You know, the only thing that truly bothers me about this release is the statement by Hathaway that states: &quot;The sun is now near the low point of its 11-year activity cycle,&quot; says Hathaway. &quot;We call this &#039;Solar Minimum.&#039; It is the period of quiet that separates one Solar Max from another.&quot;

That would be a lovely statement if SC23 hadn&#039;t started in May of 2006. Last time I checked, eleven years rolled by in May of 2007. It&#039;s July of 2008. We&#039;re two months into year twelve of SC23. Shouting &quot;eleven years, eleven years, eleven years&quot; with your fingers in your ears isn&#039;t going to make May of 2007 come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New update from David Hathaway at NASA:</p>
<p><a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/11jul_solarcycleupdate.htm" rel="nofollow">http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/11jul_solarcycleupdate.htm</a></p>
<p>You know, the only thing that truly bothers me about this release is the statement by Hathaway that states: &#8220;The sun is now near the low point of its 11-year activity cycle,&#8221; says Hathaway. &#8220;We call this &#8216;Solar Minimum.&#8217; It is the period of quiet that separates one Solar Max from another.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would be a lovely statement if SC23 hadn&#8217;t started in May of 2006. Last time I checked, eleven years rolled by in May of 2007. It&#8217;s July of 2008. We&#8217;re two months into year twelve of SC23. Shouting &#8220;eleven years, eleven years, eleven years&#8221; with your fingers in your ears isn&#8217;t going to make May of 2007 come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
