<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A single sunspot means the minimum is over?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/07/07/a-single-sunsopt-means-the-minimum-is-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/07/07/a-single-sunsopt-means-the-minimum-is-over/</link>
	<description>A blog of solar physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:44:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Tapping: Still no sign of the next cycle &#171; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/07/07/a-single-sunsopt-means-the-minimum-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Tapping: Still no sign of the next cycle &#171; Watts Up With That?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/?p=150#comment-598</guid>
		<description>[...] on this blog, I’d mentioned my skepticism that one decent sunspot marked the end of the hiatus in the solar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on this blog, I’d mentioned my skepticism that one decent sunspot marked the end of the hiatus in the solar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Gary Fox</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/07/07/a-single-sunsopt-means-the-minimum-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>J Gary Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/?p=150#comment-591</guid>
		<description>One sunspot does not make a complete cycle, neither does one fine group, similarly one brief time of sunspot observations will not make a solar scientist entirely happy. 

(Apologizes to Aristotle and his comment on swallows and summer)

Most of the July sunspot activity is related to one small group which is now disappearing behind the sun’s limb.  

Nothing is seen emerging and the sunspot count may again drop to zero.

As one who has followed the travails of the experts trying to first forecast Cycle 24 and then trying to explain the dearth of sunspots, we should not declare the “minimum is over”. 

 Yes, we have “The One”, but does it mean that we won’t have another period of low or no activity?

It was only a few years ago, that the experts predicted a very intense Cycle 24 based on their “theories” and their proven accuracy in predicting the intensity of Cycle 23.  

http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast19oct98_1.htm

&quot;Oct. 19, 1998: Scientists at NASA&#039;s Marshall Space Flight Center appear to have done a good job of predicting Cycle 23 of the sunspot cycle.

&quot;They expect Cycle 23 to continue until sometime in 2006 when the next cycle, Cycle 24, should begin.&quot; (If you invert the 6 in 2006 … they were correct.)

Too bad the Sun wasn&#039;t invested in the &quot;proven&quot; theory.

No expert predicted the late start of Cycle 24 or the deep quiet phase of the sun in all measurable energies. 

We live in exciting Solar times ... stay tuned for the conclusion of Cycle 24 ... and, if possible, the complete Cycle 25.

 After 24 ends and 25 definitely begins, only then will we know the actual intensity or lack of intensity of the enigmatic Cycle 24.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One sunspot does not make a complete cycle, neither does one fine group, similarly one brief time of sunspot observations will not make a solar scientist entirely happy. </p>
<p>(Apologizes to Aristotle and his comment on swallows and summer)</p>
<p>Most of the July sunspot activity is related to one small group which is now disappearing behind the sun’s limb.  </p>
<p>Nothing is seen emerging and the sunspot count may again drop to zero.</p>
<p>As one who has followed the travails of the experts trying to first forecast Cycle 24 and then trying to explain the dearth of sunspots, we should not declare the “minimum is over”. </p>
<p> Yes, we have “The One”, but does it mean that we won’t have another period of low or no activity?</p>
<p>It was only a few years ago, that the experts predicted a very intense Cycle 24 based on their “theories” and their proven accuracy in predicting the intensity of Cycle 23.  </p>
<p><a href="http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast19oct98_1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast19oct98_1.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Oct. 19, 1998: Scientists at NASA&#8217;s Marshall Space Flight Center appear to have done a good job of predicting Cycle 23 of the sunspot cycle.</p>
<p>&#8220;They expect Cycle 23 to continue until sometime in 2006 when the next cycle, Cycle 24, should begin.&#8221; (If you invert the 6 in 2006 … they were correct.)</p>
<p>Too bad the Sun wasn&#8217;t invested in the &#8220;proven&#8221; theory.</p>
<p>No expert predicted the late start of Cycle 24 or the deep quiet phase of the sun in all measurable energies. </p>
<p>We live in exciting Solar times &#8230; stay tuned for the conclusion of Cycle 24 &#8230; and, if possible, the complete Cycle 25.</p>
<p> After 24 ends and 25 definitely begins, only then will we know the actual intensity or lack of intensity of the enigmatic Cycle 24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Tapping: Still no sign of the next cycle &#187; Blog Post &#187; Solar Science</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/07/07/a-single-sunsopt-means-the-minimum-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Tapping: Still no sign of the next cycle &#187; Blog Post &#187; Solar Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/?p=150#comment-590</guid>
		<description>[...] on this blog, I&#8217;d mentioned my skepticism that one decent sunspot marked the end of the hiatus in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on this blog, I&#8217;d mentioned my skepticism that one decent sunspot marked the end of the hiatus in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan B</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/07/07/a-single-sunsopt-means-the-minimum-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/?p=150#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Woo hoo!  That will show those denialist scum!  Yes!  The drought is over!  Cycle 24 is here, and NASA assures us it&#039;s going to be a whopper!  YEAH!  Get ready to fry, all those who would deny the dogma of Global Warming!

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#039;0 which is not a hashcash value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woo hoo!  That will show those denialist scum!  Yes!  The drought is over!  Cycle 24 is here, and NASA assures us it&#8217;s going to be a whopper!  YEAH!  Get ready to fry, all those who would deny the dogma of Global Warming!</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us &#8216;0 which is not a hashcash value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
