<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Hathaway: Mea Culpa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/10/31/david-hathaway-mea-culpa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/10/31/david-hathaway-mea-culpa/</link>
	<description>A blog of solar physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:44:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Hand</title>
		<link>http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/10/31/david-hathaway-mea-culpa/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://solarscience.auditblogs.com/2009/10/31/david-hathaway-mea-culpa/#comment-755</guid>
		<description>This is the way science should be.  We all make assumptions based on the available data at the time.  Good science is when researches are willing to admit their error and move forward with the current best available data, even when it conflicts with their previous statements.

Some at CRU and NASA can&#039;t seem to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the way science should be.  We all make assumptions based on the available data at the time.  Good science is when researches are willing to admit their error and move forward with the current best available data, even when it conflicts with their previous statements.</p>
<p>Some at CRU and NASA can&#8217;t seem to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
